The Lying M$M, The Alternative Gatekeepers and Their Respective Flocks
When discussing 9/11 'Conspiracy Theories', the guillibility of many supposed 'critical thinkers', will never cease to amaze me. There are many people that claim that they 'don't believe' the Official Fairy Tale given to us by the M$M and THEN parrotted by government officials.
These people have many different theories of what really happened, from LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) to plane-swaps by the military. There is even a very, very small group that maintains the no planes reality, myself included.
Most of the theorists have at least one common denominator, ThePLAINS PLANES.
Some examples of the theories.
Village Voice
Popular Mechanics
We will we will FLOCK YOU.
We will we will FLOCK YOU.
Now get this, there has supposedly been a 'division' created in the '9/11 Truth Movement' over the issue that some people maintain a no planes perspective. This small group is being blamed for 'turning off' Joe 6-Pack from looking into the anomalies of 9/11.
This is patently ubsurd. Do you really believe that a group of less than 100 people that post on forums, run a few obscure blogs or put up a web page or two are having ANY influence on the average citizen?
The M$M & the Gatekeepers are the ones that influence Joe 6-Pack, not a small group of internet users with a different perspective. The people that have bought into this myth have shown that their mental fortitude has about as much stamina as single-ply tissue in a hurricane.
It is very difficult to get the average person on the street to go from 'foreign terrorists' to LIHOP. To make the leap from terrorists to faked media psyop is therefore impossible.
Seeing that this is the case, Who Really Gains From Disseminating IT? There seem to be so few that support the no planes perspective, Why such the BIG fuss about us?
Who created it? Webfairy? Dr. Grossman? Brianv? Me?
The Gatekeepers are the ones that created this 'division' as a way to keep their flocks in check. It is great fortune for the M$M & the Gatekeepers that their flocks never question the 'information' that they provide or the MOTIVES for providing that 'information'.
Why are the Gatekeepers so intent on discrediting the no plane perspective? If it truly had no merit, it would never be discussed or it would be debunked and tossed down the memory hole, as was the "Raelian Cult Clones" story.
The fact that they have brought it up and put such a negative view to this perspective is encouraging, at least to me. For the 'pre-emptive strike' shows that this is an issue that they are afraid to have openly and freely discussed.
To make matters even more ironic is the fact that most of the people that attack the no plane perspective, partly support it by saying there was no plane at the Pentagon or Shanksville.
WTF? Talk about sitting on the fence, the Official Fairy Tale says four planes, yet these theorists claim there was only two, because they have pictures & videos to prove it. Well I have pictures & videos of Aliens detroying the Earth, big deal.
I guess the fence sitting is like being 'kinda pregnant'.
I challenge you 'flock-stars' to go out and ask 20 people that you do not know if they have ever even heard of the no planes at all perspective in regard to the events of 9/11.
I'll bet that you don't find 2 that have, never mind enough to say the majority of Joe 6-Packs don't pay attention to the issues 9/11 for they had heard the no planes perspective and it "turned them off of conspiracy theories."
The Branch Davidians are a small, obscure sect of Christianity. Can you imagine Billy Graham, Oral Roberts or Pat Robertson going on national T.V. for the purpose of denouncing the Davidians for "Creating a Division in the Christian Movement?"
Or how about this:
"Please Gloria, don't wear the work boots, you'll divide the feminist movement."
FWIW, the sky is NOT blue, the sun will NOT rise tomorrow but I will still be discussing my perspectives whether I face Gatekeeper/Flock-star flak or not.
P.S. I spoke to the clerk at a local gas bar this morning about 9/11. He works the night shift, 11pm - 7am and listens to Coast 2 Coast, which was on when I entered the kiosk around 4am.
He told me he listens to that show 5 nights a week when he is at work and he said that he had never heard of the no planes perspective, though he also admitted that he doesn't here every minute of each show.
We talked about last night's show with James Fetzer, David Ray Griffin and Morgan Reynolds and he was still having a hard time digesting that information, to try to convince him that no planes were used would have been an exercise in extreme futility, as he can barely accept the idea of 'insider' complicity, but the fact that I brought it up didn't make him automatically 'discard' the information that he had heard on C2C.
These people have many different theories of what really happened, from LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) to plane-swaps by the military. There is even a very, very small group that maintains the no planes reality, myself included.
Most of the theorists have at least one common denominator, The
Some examples of the theories.
Village Voice
Popular Mechanics
We will we will FLOCK YOU.
We will we will FLOCK YOU.
Now get this, there has supposedly been a 'division' created in the '9/11 Truth Movement' over the issue that some people maintain a no planes perspective. This small group is being blamed for 'turning off' Joe 6-Pack from looking into the anomalies of 9/11.
This is patently ubsurd. Do you really believe that a group of less than 100 people that post on forums, run a few obscure blogs or put up a web page or two are having ANY influence on the average citizen?
The M$M & the Gatekeepers are the ones that influence Joe 6-Pack, not a small group of internet users with a different perspective. The people that have bought into this myth have shown that their mental fortitude has about as much stamina as single-ply tissue in a hurricane.
It is very difficult to get the average person on the street to go from 'foreign terrorists' to LIHOP. To make the leap from terrorists to faked media psyop is therefore impossible.
Seeing that this is the case, Who Really Gains From Disseminating IT? There seem to be so few that support the no planes perspective, Why such the BIG fuss about us?
Who created it? Webfairy? Dr. Grossman? Brianv? Me?
The Gatekeepers are the ones that created this 'division' as a way to keep their flocks in check. It is great fortune for the M$M & the Gatekeepers that their flocks never question the 'information' that they provide or the MOTIVES for providing that 'information'.
Why are the Gatekeepers so intent on discrediting the no plane perspective? If it truly had no merit, it would never be discussed or it would be debunked and tossed down the memory hole, as was the "Raelian Cult Clones" story.
The fact that they have brought it up and put such a negative view to this perspective is encouraging, at least to me. For the 'pre-emptive strike' shows that this is an issue that they are afraid to have openly and freely discussed.
To make matters even more ironic is the fact that most of the people that attack the no plane perspective, partly support it by saying there was no plane at the Pentagon or Shanksville.
WTF? Talk about sitting on the fence, the Official Fairy Tale says four planes, yet these theorists claim there was only two, because they have pictures & videos to prove it. Well I have pictures & videos of Aliens detroying the Earth, big deal.
I guess the fence sitting is like being 'kinda pregnant'.
I challenge you 'flock-stars' to go out and ask 20 people that you do not know if they have ever even heard of the no planes at all perspective in regard to the events of 9/11.
I'll bet that you don't find 2 that have, never mind enough to say the majority of Joe 6-Packs don't pay attention to the issues 9/11 for they had heard the no planes perspective and it "turned them off of conspiracy theories."
The Branch Davidians are a small, obscure sect of Christianity. Can you imagine Billy Graham, Oral Roberts or Pat Robertson going on national T.V. for the purpose of denouncing the Davidians for "Creating a Division in the Christian Movement?"
Or how about this:
"Please Gloria, don't wear the work boots, you'll divide the feminist movement."
FWIW, the sky is NOT blue, the sun will NOT rise tomorrow but I will still be discussing my perspectives whether I face Gatekeeper/Flock-star flak or not.
P.S. I spoke to the clerk at a local gas bar this morning about 9/11. He works the night shift, 11pm - 7am and listens to Coast 2 Coast, which was on when I entered the kiosk around 4am.
He told me he listens to that show 5 nights a week when he is at work and he said that he had never heard of the no planes perspective, though he also admitted that he doesn't here every minute of each show.
We talked about last night's show with James Fetzer, David Ray Griffin and Morgan Reynolds and he was still having a hard time digesting that information, to try to convince him that no planes were used would have been an exercise in extreme futility, as he can barely accept the idea of 'insider' complicity, but the fact that I brought it up didn't make him automatically 'discard' the information that he had heard on C2C.
posted by PerpetualYnquisitive at 2/25/2006 07:50:00 AM
6 comments
