Thursday, July 13, 2006

Doubleplus Doublethink Of Goldsteinian Goodness In A Newspeak Nation On Planet Pornosec**

I have already posted that it is my belief that the issue of WTC 7 is a trap. Looking back, I have decided to change my mind about that, as a trap is something usually used for catching one victim at a time. The WTC 7 issue is actually a DRIFT NET that is very slowly, almost imperceptibly encircling the "9/11 truth movement."

This is why it is pushed as the 'Crux' issue, for supposedly there was NO cause for the building to collapse, other than explosives. Not completely true. Obviously, something caused the building to collapse. In reality, explosives were used and well placed ones at that, but the M$M media isn't going to go there with John Q. Public.

Also notice that it is almost always brought up when the M$M has the 'cajones' to allow 9/11 researchers on the air to talk about September 11, 2001.

What the proles are going to be shown is that the damage caused by the North Tower caused it. Want to know how it is that I am so sure? Look at the rubble pile of WTC 7. What is the most predominant feature of the WTC 7 rubble pile? It is located just to the right of the building with the big crater through its roof.

Free Image Hosting at

The big chunk of the North wall of WTC 7 is the most predominate feature of of the WTC 7 rubble pile. Are you paying attention? Did you catch that? I'll repeat it for the sake of clarity, the big chunk of the North wall of WTC 7 is the most predominate feature of the WTC 7 rubble pile.

Have you ever sat on one of those cheap plastic stacking lawn chairs and leaned forward lifting the two back legs off the ground? Did the legs break and dump you on the ground?

Well it happened to me, busted my lip open on the table on my way to a 9.3 scoring face-plant, lip-skid combo. Do you have any idea how hard it is to get grass stains off of teeth? Luckily I wasn't picking my nose at the time, else I would have poked a new eye socket out of the back of my head.

Okay quit scratching your head in wonderment and mouthing WTF (your webcab IS still on dude and its uploading to your MySpace page) and I'll get to the point.

The M$M will pass off WTC 7's collapse on a similar mechanism. The South side was heavily damaged, the South side is where the collapse started. The South side started to buckle first, then the South side pulled the North side southward and as it was leaning South, the North side lost its structural cohesion and also collapsed.

All the Nascar Dads™™ & Soccer Moms© will lap this story up like it was Creme de L'Ambrosia.

Elementary, My Dear Watson. The 9/11 Truth movement will be safely gagged & trussed for all time, for their "Crux" issue will have no merit with the majority of the populace. Then the handful of remaining 'rabble-rousers' can easily & safely be ignored. You know, Watson, I verily do hope that they enjoy bondage, for that is to be there lot.

The moral of the story; it is wisest to not put all of one's eggs in a single basket.


In a tribute to the all derision being heaped upon any & all that dare question the M$M's OffiCIAl Fiary Tale of the events of September 11, 2001, I am going to provide some entertainment, 100% Fat-free and at no cost whatsoever for the 'Kool-Aid Brigade', Welfare Princesses & other assorted Flotsam (f.y.i, just returning the favour with the derogatory titles) that can faithfully parrot the Party line but are incapable of thinking for themselves.

You know who you are, all 4 of you.

Thus endeth the preamble, we now return you to our regularly scheduled post.

I am quite sure that anyone reading this has heard the phrase, "Think outside the Box". This phrase has been repeated Klaxonesque as a neo-classic sound-bite de jour of the potential that could be reached by a change of perspective.

Well, I am going to do just that, think outside the box.

This is a REAL conspiracy THEORY. Got that, a theory based on simple observation & applying a meme created by the M$M and applying it to pResident Bush.

There is NO evidence to support this theory and I also swear that I have not ever even heard of any person named Jerry Fletcher.

Here is a quote from Mr. Bush.
"There's an old saying in Tennessee I know it's in Texas, it's probably in Tennessee that says, fool me once, shame on shame on you. You fool me you can't get fooled again."
It is likely that he may have meant to say, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me" and just 'flubbed' it. Or did he?

You can get the video here.

The statement that pResident Bush made is actually accurate. Let's break down his quote and analyze what was said.

"...Fool me once, shame on,..., shame on you."

This make sense; the first time that you deceive me, then the shame is on you for I was unaware of your intentions.

"You fool me, you can't get fooled again."
Now this is the interesting segment of that 'mangled' saying, for here the pResident has stated the obvious, that he was deceived and the deceiver can't be fooled again. Of course the deceiver can't be fooled again, as the deceiver was not the one that was deceived the first time.

You see statements such as this as unintentional mistakes, as so called "Bushisms", but what if they are really more akin to *IEDCs (improvised esoteric delivered communications)? *this one's for you pinch (how's that for Milspeak?), I know it won't make you as history worthy (yoinked sponged from Senfeld's Elaine) as capturing USAma bin Oswald, but it's the least that I could do for you.

Do you remember the supposed hoopla against airing any tapes that supposedly came from USAma bin Oswald, because he supposedly would be able to send supposed hidden messages to supposed 'sleeper' cells, which would then supposedly initiate a new wave of supposed attacks in America based on the supposed commands that he would supposedly give in these supposedly 'hidden messages' (meme mentioned above). Holy shit, Scatman. That really is a lot of supposed suppository supposition, supposedly.

Apply that same logic to the pResident's "Bushisms", no not the suppository part, the part about sending hidden messages. ~Note to self: Damn blog is attracting too many perverted minds, consider toning down language used in future posts~

What better way to send covert messages than do it overtly, right in plain view. The simple fact is that his 'flubs' are broadcast repeatedly and posted all over the web, thus making it a very efficient delivery system, which would be virtually untraceable and easily accessed by any of his 'sleeper cells'.

I know, you are thinking this is about the craziest thing that you have read in at least a month or three, but maybe you should back prior to the 2000 election and go over Mr. Bush's speech record, to find all the 'retro' Bushisms, the pre-pResident Bushisms. Not nearly as a bountiful harvest as the words of the 'new millennium man' seeking higher office.

Strange how it seems his ability to speak eloquently in public diminished so much after becoming pResident, but then again when he was only the governor of Texas, such 'flubs' would not have been internationally disseminated, making it a poor conduit for sending secret communications.

While on the subject of Bushisms, many of you have heard that the pResident has stated, that he saw the first plane hit the tower. Here is the clip if you haven't heard it yet.

Now that you have heard what he said, it is easy to see that if pressured Mr. Bush can state it was a simple misstatement, that he meant that he saw that a plane HAD hit the second tower and voila the 'conspiracy theory' that he saw the first impact 'live' on a CCTV feed is dead.

Very crafty of you Mr. Bush and you would have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for those meddling kids and their blog. Jinkies.

I brought up this quote to further demonstrate the illogical behavior of many in the so called Truth movement. You see on one hand they are telling you NOT TO take what the pResident says seriously, yet at the same time they are telling you TO take what the pResident says seriously.

Are you starting to see how this works? Heads they win, Tails you lose.

I'm not a grandiloquent speaker, nor do I get paid to play one on T.V. so I write this blog instead.

It's time to not just think outside the box, it's time to unplug from the hive-mind.

**Here is a link to look up the meaning of the words in the title of this article: The Newspeak Dictionary


Anonymous james ha said...

dude focus on what can be proven! WTC7! you are hurting my movement!
haha. -
hey the newspeak section (part2) of this thread is very perceptive. kudos! actually, so is the first (driftnet) part.

Friday, July 14, 2006 11:00:00 PM  
Blogger PerpetualYnquisitive said...

dude, didn't you know that i'm dividing the 'truth' movement with the millions* of people that visit this blog, that listen to my 16 hours of daily shortwave broadcasts, that buy my 14,803 videos about how bush/cheney are behind the 9/11 'conspiracy', that buy my 631 books, that buy my t-shirts, keychains and storagable food.

hone$tly, i'm ju$t $preading a$ much truth a$ a $ingle per$on po$$ibly can.

*this figure will be reached; if my blog is read by the same number of people as of the present time, until the year 46,286 A.D., roughly

Friday, July 14, 2006 11:40:00 PM  
Blogger War On Suckers said...

Dude, don't forget to factor in the gold/silver coins and berkey water filters!

Sunday, July 16, 2006 9:29:00 AM  
Blogger PerpetualYnquisitive said...

war on suckers, thanx for reminding me, but I am $orry to $ay that it is not po$$ible to $hare even a $mall portion with anyone el$e.

MINE MINE MINE, welcome to "The Cult of Pur$enility"

Thursday, July 27, 2006 5:42:00 PM  
Blogger New Mexico Man said...

PI, you are highlarious. I am getting a kick out of this old-ass blog. Where the hell did we all go, anyway? Like, what? A normal person can't sustain interest in such a mindbogglingly, galaxy-twistingly plop-drop pile of delicious garbage and organic refuse as the 9/11 question? Long ago I tired of the issue, as you well know. Of course, I still wear my invisible tinfoil hat. The main difference is that I don't care. The depth of my apathy knows no bounds. At least, that's what I tell myself in order to retain my grip on sanity for long enough to admire the cracks in cliffside before careening, cinematically, into the chasm below.

Monday, November 26, 2007 6:27:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home